28923 { "metadata": { "url": "https://www.commerce.gov.in/international-trade/india-and-world-trade-organization-wto/indias-gats-schedule-for-commitments-and-offers/trade-negotiating-committee/council-for-trade-in-services-special-session-communication-from-bolivia-brazil-chile-china-colombia-cuba-dominican-republic-ecuador-egypt-guatemala-india-indonesia-mexico-nicaragua", "title": "Council for Trade in Services - Special Session - Communication from Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paki-...- on Trade in Services (S-L-93) 31-03-2004 - Mcommerce", "meta_description": "", "meta_keywords": "commerce,antidumping,TRADE,Press release, MOC" }, "content": "Council for Trade in Services - Special Session - Communication from Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paki-...- on Trade in Services (S-L-93) 31-03-2004 - Mcommerce\nWelcome to Department of Commerce\nScreen reader access\nSkip to Main content\n+A\nA\n-A\nEnglish\nHindi\nEN\nHi\nGovernment of India\nMinistry of Commerce and Industry\nDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE\nFactsheet on conclusion of India-EU Free Trade Agreement\nFact Sheet-India and New Zealand Conclude Free Trade Agreement\nIndia - UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)\nAbout Us\nDepartment Of Commerce\nDepartment setup and function\nSubject Under Administrative Control\nAdvisory Board\nBilateral Chamber of Commerce\nOfficers handling Public / Staff grievances\nCitizen Charter\nAppellate Committee\nDivisions\nInternational Trade Policy Division\nTrade Policy Division\nRules, FTA Coordination, Regional and Plurilateral Division\nG-20\nForeign Trade Territorial Division\nForeign Trade (Africa)\nForeign Trade (NAFTA)\nForeign Trade (Latin American and Caribbean)\nForeign Trade (Europe)\nForeign Trade (CIS)\nForeign Trade (WANA)\nForeign Trade ( ASEAN )\nForeign Trade (North East Asia)\nForeign Trade (Oceania)\nForeign Trade (South Asia)\nForeign Trade (Coordination)\nForeign Trade (Minerals and Ores)\nForeign Trade (State Trading)\nESCAP\nExport Promotion (Export Inspection)\nExport Products Division\nExport Products (Agriculture)\nGems and Jewellery\nEngineering\nElectronics and Computer Software\nChemicals and Allied Products\nOverseas Projects and Services\nExport Services Division\nEP-Textiles Coordination Division\nEP (Services)\nExport And Market Development Assistance (E&MDA)\nExport Industries Division\nPlantation (A)-Tea\nPlantation (B)-Coffee\nPlantation (C)-Rubber\nPlantation (D)-Spices\nTrade Finance Services\nInfrastructure Division\nSEZ Division\nSEZ (Admin)\nSpecial Economic Zones (SEZ)\nExport Oriented Units (EOU)\nExport Products (Pharmaceuticals)\nExport Promotion (Marine Products)\nVigilance\nGeneral Administration & Records Section\nEstablishment-II\nEP(LSG) Division\nEconomic Division\nExport Planning\nAdministration and General Service Division\nEstablishment-I\nWomen Cell\nEstablishment-III\nEstablishment-IV\nTrade Commissioner/Trade Assistance\nCash-I\nCash-II\nCashier Cell\nProtocol\nGeneral Administration and Welfare Cell\nHindi\nOrganisation and Methods/Internal Work Study Unit/Career Management and Training\nRecord Cell\nReceipt and Issue\nRTI Cell\nVigilance Division\nSupply Division\nLitigation & Arbitration Section\nCash and Accounts Section\nEstablishment – I, RE & SSEC Section\nEstablishment – II Section\nFinance Division\nFinance Branch\nVigilance and Confidential Section\nGeM, Coord. and RP&I Section\nTrade Promotion Division\nTrade Promotion-A\nTrade Promotion-B\nAttached Offices\nDirectorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR)\nDirectorate General of Foreign Trade\nSubordinate Offices\nPay and Accounts Office (Supply)\nPay and Accounts Office (Commerce & Textiles)\nSpecial Economic Zones\nDirectorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics\nAutonomous Bodies\nThe Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA)\nAgricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA)\nCommodity boards\nCoffee Board\nRubber Board\nTea Board\nTobacco Board\nSpices Board\nExport Inspection Council\nIndian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT)\nIndian Institute of Packaging (IIP)\nPublic Sector Undertakings\nState Trading Corporation (STC)\nPEC Limited\nMMTC Limited\nExport Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Limited\nIndia Trade Promotion Organisation\nGeM\nExport Promotion Councils\nEEPC India\nElectronics and Computer Software Export Promotion Council\nExport Promotion Council for EOUs & SEZa\nTelecom Equipment and Services Export Promotion Council\nMobile and Electronic Devices Export Promotion Council\nFederation of Indian Export Organisation\nProject Exports Promotion Council of India (PEPC)\nBasic Chemicals,Cosmetics and Dyes Export Promotion Council (Chemexcil)\nChemicals and Allied Products Export Promotion Council (CAPEXIL)\nCouncil for Leather Exports\nSports Goods & Toys Export Promotion Council\nGem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council\nShellac Export Promotion Council\nCashew Export Promotion Council of India\nThe Plastics Export Promotion Council\nPharmaceutical Export Promotion Council\nIndian Oil Seeds And Produce Export Promotion Council (IOPEPC)\nServices Export Promotion Council\nOther Organisation\nIndian Diamond Institute\nIndia Brand Equity Foundation\nPrice Stabilization Fund Trust\nIndian Institute of Plantation Management, Bengaluru\nNational Export Insurance Account (NEIA Trust)\nWhats New\nInternational Trade\nIndia and World Trade Organization (WTO)\nTrade Agreements\nJoint Statements and Minutes of the Meetings\nFAQs on FTAs\nTBT and SPS Portals\nIndia Trade Portal of SAARC, ASEAN and top 25 Countries\nTrade Promotion Programmes and Schemes\n7th Trade Policy Review (TPR) of India\nFAQs on FTAs Engineering Sector\nEU GSP Scheme of Self Certification\nTrade Statistics\nNiryat Portal\nMedia\nDepartmental Updates\nPublications/ Reports\nPress Releases\nPhoto Gallery\nVideo Gallery\nMajor Achievements\nRTI\nGeneral Matters on RTI\nApplication Forms\nSuo Moto Disclosure under RTI Act\nFAQs\nWho’s Who\nContact\nAbout Us\nDepartment Of Commerce\nDivisions\nAttached Offices\nSubordinate Offices\nAutonomous Bodies\nPublic Sector Undertakings\nGeM\nExports Promotion Councils\nOther Organisations\nINTERNATIONAL TRADE\nIndia And World Trade Organization (WTO)\nTrade Agreements\nFAQs on FTAs\nJoint Statements And Minutes Of The Meetings\nTBT And SPS Portals\nIndia Trade Portal of SAARC, ASEAN and top 25 Countries\nTrade Promotion Programmes and Schemes\nSixth Trade Policy Review of India\nFAQs on FTAs Engineering Sector\nEU GSP Scheme of Self Certification\nTRADE STATISTICS\nLatest Trade Figures\nExport Import Data Bank (Annual)\nExport Import Data Bank (Monthly)\nForeign Trade Performance Analysis (FTPA)\nDashboard\nMEDIA\nDepartmental Updates\nPublications/ Reports\nPress Releases\nMajor Achievements\nPhoto Gallery\nVideo Gallery\nWHATS NEW\nTRADE PROMOTION\nACTS AND SCHEMES\nBUDGET\nParliamentary Business\nLINKS FOR PUBLIC INTERFACES\nTRAINING NOTICES\nTender Guidelines\nCONTACT\nMonitoring System\nVACANCIES\nRTI\nORGANIZATIONAL CHART\nUSEFUL LINKS\nSitemap\nDisclaimer\nHelp\nWebsite Policy\nFeedback\nArchive\nDepartment of Commerce Grievance Management System\nURL\nGovernment of India\nMinistry of Commerce and Industry\nDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE\n19th CII India Africa Business Conclave\nWorld Bank’s B-Ready Project\n+A\nA\n-A\nEnglish\nHindi\nAbout Us\nDepartment Of Commerce\nDepartment setup and function\nSubject Under Administrative Control\nAdvisory Board\nBilateral Chamber of Commerce\nOfficers handling Public / Staff grievances\nCitizen Charter\nAppellate Committee\nDivisions\nInternational Trade Policy Division\nForeign Trade Territorial Division\nExport Products Division\nExport Industries Division\nExport Services Division\nSEZ Division\nEconomic Division\nAdministration and General Service Division\nVigilance Division\nFinance Division\nSupply Division\nLogistics Division\nAttached Offices\nSubordinate Offices\nAutonomous Bodies\nThe Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA)\nAgricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA)\nCommodity boards\nCoffee Board\nRubber Board\nTea Board\nTobacco Board\nSpices Board\nExport Inspection Council\nIndian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT)\nIndian Institute of Packaging (IIP)\nPublic Sector Undertakings\nState Trading Corporation (STC)\nPEC Limited\nMMTC Limited\nExport Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Limited\nIndia Trade Promotion Organisation\nGeM\nExport Promotion Councils\nFederation of Indian Export Organisation\nEEPC India\nExport Promotion Council for EOUs.&.SEZa\nProject Exports Promotion Council of India (PEPC)\nBasic Chemicals,Cosmetics and Dyes Export Promotion Council (Chemexcil)\nChemicals and Allied Products Export Promotion Council (CAPEXIL)\nCouncil for Leather Exports\nSports Goods Export Promotion Council\nGem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council\nShellac Export Promotion Council\nCashew Export Promotion Council of India\nThe Plastics Export Promotion Council\nPharmaceutical Export Promotion Council\nIndian Oil Seeds And Produce Export Promotion Council (IOPEPC)\nServices Export Promotion Council\nOther Organisations\nIndian Diamond Institute\nIndia Brand Equity Foundation\nPrice Stabilization Fund Trust\nIndian Institute of Plantation Management, Bengaluru\nNational Export Insurance Account (NEIA Trust)\nWhat’s New\nInternational Trade\nIndia and World Trade Organization (WTO)\nTrade Agreements\nFAQs on FTAs\nJoint Statements and Minutes of the Meetings\nTBT and SPS Portals\nIndia Trade Portal of SAARC, ASEAN and top 25 Countries\nTrade Promotion Programmes and Schemes\n7th Trade Policy Review (TPR) of India\nFAQs on FTAs Engineering Sector\nEU GSP Scheme of Self Certification\nTrade Statistics\nNiryat Portal\nMedia\nDepartmental Updates\nPublications/ Reports\nPress Releases\nMajor Achievements\nPhoto Gallery\nVideo Gallery\nRTI\nGeneral Matters on RTI\nSuo Moto Disclosure under RTI Act\nApplication Forms\nFAQs\nWho’s Who\nContact\nShort Links\nTrade Promotion\nActs and Schemes\nBudget\nParliamentary Business\nLinks for Public Interfaces\nTraining Notices\nTender Notices\nVacancies\nMonitoring System\nOrganizational Chart\nUseful Links\nFeedback\nSitemap\nDisclaimer\nHelp\nWebsite Policy\nFeedback\nArchive\nDepartment of Commerce Grievance Management System\nIndia’s GATS Schedule for Commitments and Offers\nTrade Negotiating Committee\nCouncil for Trade in Services – Special Session – Communication from Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paki–…– on Trade in Services (S-L-93) 31-03-2004\nInternational Trade\nInternational Trade\nIndia and World Trade Organization (WTO)\nTrade Agreements\nFAQs on FTAs\nJoint Statements and Minutes of the Meetings\nTBT and SPS Portals\nIndia Trade Portal of SAARC, ASEAN and top 25 Countries\nTrade Promotion Programmes and Schemes\n7th Trade Policy Review (TPR) of India\nFAQs on FTAs Engineering Sector\nEU GSP Scheme of Self Certification\nCouncil for Trade in Services – Special Session – Communication from Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paki–…– on Trade in Services (S-L-93) 31-03-2004\nIndian Papers/ submissions on Services in WTO\nWorld Trade Organization\nRESTRICTED\nTN/S/W/19\n31 March 2004\n(04-1460)\nCouncil for Trade in Services\nSpecial Session\nOriginal: English\nCOMMUNICATION FROM BOLIVIA, BRAzIL, CHILE, CHINA, COLOMBIA, CUBA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, ECUADOR, EGYPT, GUATEMALA, INDIA, INDONESIA, MEXICO, NICARAGUA, PAKISTAN, PERU, PHILIPPINES AND THAILAND\nReview of Progress as established in Paragraph 15 of the Guidelines and Procedures for the Negotiations on Trade in Services (S/L/93)\nThe following communication, dated 29 March 2004, from the delegations of Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines and Thailand is being circulated to the Members of the Council for Trade in Services.\nI. INTRODUCTION\nThe delegations of Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines and Thailand present this contribution for the consideration of all Members. Pursuant to paragraph 15 of the Guidelines and Procedures for the Negotiations on Trade in Services (S/L/93), this contribution is intended to initiate a discussion in the Council for Trade in Services in its Special Session about the extent to which Article IV of the GATS is being implemented in the on-going negotiations.\nThe Doha Work Programme seeks to place the needs and interests of developing and least-developed Members at the centre of the negotiations. Paragraph 2 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration states,”…The majority of WTO Members are developing countries. We seek to place their needs and interests at the heart of the Work Programme adopted in this Declaration…”. In this regard, the effective implementation of the objectives established in the Preamble, and Articles IV and XIX of the GATS namely to increase the participation of developing Members in world trade – through the negotiation of specific commitments – with a view towards promoting their economic growth and development, is necessary.\nWe believe that a systematic and careful review is required within the framework of the current negotiations to determine the extent to which commercially meaningful market access and national treatment commitments have been offered to developing Members. The initial offers that have been presented by developed Members thus far, in our assessment, have not responded to the requests made and interests expressed by developing Members.\nIn light of the above, this contribution attempts to address the extent to which initial offers tabled by developed Members have contributed to the operationalization of the obligations established in Article IV of the GATS. Consequently, it focuses on the question of whether initial offers presented by developed countries provide meaningful market access in sectors and modes of supply in which a number of developing Members have expressed specific interest in obtaining meaningful market access commitments through their requests and proposals. Although there are other sectors and modes of supply of present and potential interest for developing Members, the co-sponsors of this contribution, in the first phase of this collective review exercise, have focused on an issue of significant relevance to many developing Members: the movement of natural persons – Mode 4.\nThe need to achieve effective liberalisation in this mode of service supply during the current services negotiation has been identified as a common interest by many developing Members. To date, several negotiating proposals have been presented by Members, either individually or together with other Members, as well as individual requests presented to their trading partners seeking effective liberalisation in Mode 4. However, initial offers have not met the needs identified and emphasized by developing Members throughout this process.\nII. ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESS ON COMMON ELEMENTS IDENTIFIED IN NEGOTIATING PROPOSALS AND REQUESTS MADE BY DEVELOPING MEMBERS\nTo date, the interest expressed by developing Members through negotiating proposals and requests allow them to identify common elements to address the main issues of concern. These common elements inter alia relate to ideas for improving mode 4 commitments, either by undertaking new market access commitments or by increasing the effectiveness of existing ones by eliminating the restrictions. The elements included in various communications presented by developing Members could be used as criteria to assess the extent of commercially meaningful market access and national treatment commitments being offered, and thus ensure the effective implementation of paragraph 15 of the guidelines. The elements are:\nExpansion of Commitments in categories de-linked to Mode 3: Developing Members have requested to expand the scope of commitments by covering a wider range of service provider categories and occupations in order to balance the asymmetrical absence of commitments for categories of personnel de-linked from the commercial presence. In addition, the requests seek to expand market access beyond categories such as Intra Corporate Transferees (ICTs) and Business Visitors to include other categories such as Contractual Service Suppliers (CSS) and Independent Service Providers (ISP). Only a few initial offers introduce additional categories into their horizontal commitments. However, these new categories offered are related to personnel linked to commercial presence and do not cover different levels of skills.\nAttached Restrictions: Developing Members have requested the elimination of a variety of restrictive conditions that are attached to the mode 4 commitments, which further erode the value of existing commitments. In addition, requests seek to establish clear and objective criteria for some of the conditions attached to the mode 4 commitments. The existing attached conditions include inter alia restrictions on the duration of stay, pre-employment conditions and other requirements, economic needs, labour market and management needs tests, quantitative restrictions through numerical quotas, discriminatory tax treatment, requirements for work permits, residency and citizenship requirements, recognition of professional qualifications, wage parity, and others. Only a few of the initial offers have removed some of the restrictions and requirements attached to previous commitments, while the majority of initial offers remain silent on this aspect.\nWork Permits and Visas Procedures: One of the main restrictions that exist in Mode 4 commitments is that they remain subject to cumbersome and non-transparent administrative procedures and regulations. Consequently, developing Members have requested the need to address this concern by means of establishing transparent and objective criteria either as an additional commitment under Article XVIII or by introducing a Service Provider Visa. In addition, developing Members have expressed interest in further discussing the application and processing for visas and work permits procedures under the Working Party on Domestic Regulation. Initial offers made thus far remain silent on this issue as well.\nPredictability of Commitments: Developing Members have asked for clarifications regarding existing categories and for the introduction of common understanding on different service provider categories. Having common understanding would contribute to increase the predictability and transparency of commitments in Mode 4. The objective is not to achieve perfect harmonization of categories in the domestic regimes of all Members, but use of certain common categories of interest to all Members. The informal note presented by the WTO Secretariat titled “Categories of natural persons subject to Commitments under Mode 4” presents an interesting review of the categories of natural persons applied in the horizontal section of existing schedules and initial offers. It may be noted in this regard that few Members have offered to add definitions to a category in their schedule of commitments.\nI. CONCLUSIONS\nAfter analysing the initial offers presented by developed Members, in our assessment, most of these offers do not show any real improvement to the existing commitments in Mode 4. Some Members have not introduced any improvement to the existing commitments; others have only introduced some minor changes aimed at clarifying and only in a few cases expanding the scope of commitments. Basically commitments continue to be limited to categories of personnel related to commercial presence despite the expressed interest of developing Members for commitments in categories de-linked from commercial presence as well.\nWhile it is recognised that this is the first set of offers presented, many developing Members have expressed disappointment at the level of ambition shown in this particular area, which is crucial to effectively implement the objectives of Article IV of the GATS. Developing Members in general have comparative advantages only in a narrow range of services activities. The primary mode for most of these relates to Mode 4. The liberalisation of this mode of supply would, therefore, provide effective market access to service providers from developing Members and contribute significantly to the implementation of Article IV of the GATS.\nHome\nAbout Us\nWebsite Policy\nFeedback\nEngagement of ICs\nSitemap\nDisclaimer\nHelp\nContact\nShare With\nDownload Mobile Application\nCopyright 2023 (with latest amendments), all rights reserved with Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India\nThe site is best viewed in Chrome 92.0 , Firefox 89.0 or Microsoft Edge 92.0 and standard resolution is 1920*1080\nLast Updated: \n\t\t\tNovember 8, 2024\nVisitors : \n\t\t\t 310782608", "html": "\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCouncil for Trade in Services - Special Session - Communication from Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paki-...- on Trade in Services (S-L-93) 31-03-2004 - Mcommerce\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t Welcome to Department of Commerce\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t
    \n
  • \"Facebook\"
    • \n
  • \"Twitter\"
    • \n
  • \"Instagram\"
    • \n
\n
\n
\n
Screen reader access
\n
Skip to Main content
\n
\"Color
\n
\n +A \n A \n -A \n
\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n\"State\n
\n
\n

Government of India

\n

Ministry of Commerce and Industry

\n

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n

\n Factsheet on conclusion of India-EU Free Trade Agreement

\n

\n Fact Sheet-India and New Zealand Conclude Free Trade Agreement

\n

\n India - UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)

\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n\"Logo\"\n
\n
\n

Government of India

\n

Ministry of Commerce and Industry

\n

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

\n
\n
\n\n
\n
19th CII India Africa Business Conclave\n
World Bank’s B-Ready Project
\n\n
\n
    \n
  • \"Facebook\"
    • \n
  • \"Twitter\"
    • \n
  • \"Instagram\"
    • \n
\n
\n
\n
\n +A \n A \n -A \n
\n
\"Color
\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\r\n\t\t\t\t\t International Trade \r\n\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n
\r\n International Trade \r\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n

\tCouncil for Trade in Services – Special Session – Communication from Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paki–…– on Trade in Services (S-L-93) 31-03-2004

\n
\nIndian Papers/ submissions on Services in WTO\n
\n

World Trade Organization

\n

RESTRICTED
\nTN/S/W/19
\n31 March 2004

\n

(04-1460)

\n
\nCouncil for Trade in Services
\nSpecial Session\n
\n

Original: English

\n
\nCOMMUNICATION FROM BOLIVIA, BRAzIL, CHILE, CHINA, COLOMBIA, CUBA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, ECUADOR, EGYPT, GUATEMALA, INDIA, INDONESIA, MEXICO, NICARAGUA, PAKISTAN, PERU, PHILIPPINES AND THAILAND
\n

Review of Progress as established in Paragraph 15 of the Guidelines and Procedures for the Negotiations on Trade in Services (S/L/93)

\n

The following communication, dated 29 March 2004, from the delegations of Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines and Thailand is being circulated to the Members of the Council for Trade in Services.

\n
\nI. INTRODUCTION
\n
    \n
  • The delegations of Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines and Thailand present this contribution for the consideration of all Members. Pursuant to paragraph 15 of the Guidelines and Procedures for the Negotiations on Trade in Services (S/L/93), this contribution is intended to initiate a discussion in the Council for Trade in Services in its Special Session about the extent to which Article IV of the GATS is being implemented in the on-going negotiations.
    • \n
  • The Doha Work Programme seeks to place the needs and interests of developing and least-developed Members at the centre of the negotiations. Paragraph 2 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration states,”…The majority of WTO Members are developing countries. We seek to place their needs and interests at the heart of the Work Programme adopted in this Declaration…”. In this regard, the effective implementation of the objectives established in the Preamble, and Articles IV and XIX of the GATS namely to increase the participation of developing Members in world trade – through the negotiation of specific commitments – with a view towards promoting their economic growth and development, is necessary.
    • \n
  • We believe that a systematic and careful review is required within the framework of the current negotiations to determine the extent to which commercially meaningful market access and national treatment commitments have been offered to developing Members. The initial offers that have been presented by developed Members thus far, in our assessment, have not responded to the requests made and interests expressed by developing Members.
    • \n
  • In light of the above, this contribution attempts to address the extent to which initial offers tabled by developed Members have contributed to the operationalization of the obligations established in Article IV of the GATS. Consequently, it focuses on the question of whether initial offers presented by developed countries provide meaningful market access in sectors and modes of supply in which a number of developing Members have expressed specific interest in obtaining meaningful market access commitments through their requests and proposals. Although there are other sectors and modes of supply of present and potential interest for developing Members, the co-sponsors of this contribution, in the first phase of this collective review exercise, have focused on an issue of significant relevance to many developing Members: the movement of natural persons – Mode 4.
    • \n
  • The need to achieve effective liberalisation in this mode of service supply during the current services negotiation has been identified as a common interest by many developing Members. To date, several negotiating proposals have been presented by Members, either individually or together with other Members, as well as individual requests presented to their trading partners seeking effective liberalisation in Mode 4. However, initial offers have not met the needs identified and emphasized by developing Members throughout this process.
    • \n
\n
\nII. ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESS ON COMMON ELEMENTS IDENTIFIED IN NEGOTIATING PROPOSALS AND REQUESTS MADE BY DEVELOPING MEMBERS\n
\n
    \n
  • To date, the interest expressed by developing Members through negotiating proposals and requests allow them to identify common elements to address the main issues of concern. These common elements inter alia relate to ideas for improving mode 4 commitments, either by undertaking new market access commitments or by increasing the effectiveness of existing ones by eliminating the restrictions. The elements included in various communications presented by developing Members could be used as criteria to assess the extent of commercially meaningful market access and national treatment commitments being offered, and thus ensure the effective implementation of paragraph 15 of the guidelines. The elements are:
    • \n
  • Expansion of Commitments in categories de-linked to Mode 3: Developing Members have requested to expand the scope of commitments by covering a wider range of service provider categories and occupations in order to balance the asymmetrical absence of commitments for categories of personnel de-linked from the commercial presence. In addition, the requests seek to expand market access beyond categories such as Intra Corporate Transferees (ICTs) and Business Visitors to include other categories such as Contractual Service Suppliers (CSS) and Independent Service Providers (ISP). Only a few initial offers introduce additional categories into their horizontal commitments. However, these new categories offered are related to personnel linked to commercial presence and do not cover different levels of skills.
    • \n
  • Attached Restrictions: Developing Members have requested the elimination of a variety of restrictive conditions that are attached to the mode 4 commitments, which further erode the value of existing commitments. In addition, requests seek to establish clear and objective criteria for some of the conditions attached to the mode 4 commitments. The existing attached conditions include inter alia restrictions on the duration of stay, pre-employment conditions and other requirements, economic needs, labour market and management needs tests, quantitative restrictions through numerical quotas, discriminatory tax treatment, requirements for work permits, residency and citizenship requirements, recognition of professional qualifications, wage parity, and others. Only a few of the initial offers have removed some of the restrictions and requirements attached to previous commitments, while the majority of initial offers remain silent on this aspect.
    • \n
  • Work Permits and Visas Procedures: One of the main restrictions that exist in Mode 4 commitments is that they remain subject to cumbersome and non-transparent administrative procedures and regulations. Consequently, developing Members have requested the need to address this concern by means of establishing transparent and objective criteria either as an additional commitment under Article XVIII or by introducing a Service Provider Visa. In addition, developing Members have expressed interest in further discussing the application and processing for visas and work permits procedures under the Working Party on Domestic Regulation. Initial offers made thus far remain silent on this issue as well.
    • \n
  • Predictability of Commitments: Developing Members have asked for clarifications regarding existing categories and for the introduction of common understanding on different service provider categories. Having common understanding would contribute to increase the predictability and transparency of commitments in Mode 4. The objective is not to achieve perfect harmonization of categories in the domestic regimes of all Members, but use of certain common categories of interest to all Members. The informal note presented by the WTO Secretariat titled “Categories of natural persons subject to Commitments under Mode 4” presents an interesting review of the categories of natural persons applied in the horizontal section of existing schedules and initial offers. It may be noted in this regard that few Members have offered to add definitions to a category in their schedule of commitments.
    • \n
\n
\nI. CONCLUSIONS\n
\n
    \n
  • After analysing the initial offers presented by developed Members, in our assessment, most of these offers do not show any real improvement to the existing commitments in Mode 4. Some Members have not introduced any improvement to the existing commitments; others have only introduced some minor changes aimed at clarifying and only in a few cases expanding the scope of commitments. Basically commitments continue to be limited to categories of personnel related to commercial presence despite the expressed interest of developing Members for commitments in categories de-linked from commercial presence as well.
    • \n
  • While it is recognised that this is the first set of offers presented, many developing Members have expressed disappointment at the level of ambition shown in this particular area, which is crucial to effectively implement the objectives of Article IV of the GATS. Developing Members in general have comparative advantages only in a narrow range of services activities. The primary mode for most of these relates to Mode 4. The liberalisation of this mode of supply would, therefore, provide effective market access to service providers from developing Members and contribute significantly to the implementation of Article IV of the GATS.
    • \n
\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n" } 0 x-amz-checksum-crc32:d97caA==